
By MICHAEL A SMITH
Insight Kansas
The Pastor of the huge, nine-campus Church of the Resurrection in the Kansas City area, Hamilton was recently attacked on X by Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
Reposting a clip from a sermon in which Hamilton called for inclusivity, Cruz wrote, âWhy do Democrats keep nominating âpreachersâ who reject the central tenets of Christianity? This heretical âsermonâ directly contradicts the BibleâŠâ
Cruz is right to feel threatened by Hamilton, a popular pastor whose religious views are sharply different from Cruzâs own. Before becoming a U.S. Senate candidate, Hamilton directly assailed Christian Nationalism in his sermons.
He argues that faith should not be used in the service of power and that the most important Biblical teaching is to love one another.
Hamilton explicitly ties Christian Nationalism to Nazism and the Ku Klux Klan. A United Methodist minister, Hamiltonâs view of Christianity rests heavily on oneâs personal journey to becoming a better, and (in his telling) more Christ-like person.
He encourages kindness, community, and patience, and calls upon his congregants to love their enemiesâ or better yet, not to have enemies at all, only those with whom they disagree.
He says he is not against patriotism, but strongly opposes the use of faith to create groups of âusâ and âthem,â and divide in the name of powerâor worse yetâsome sort of imagined ethnic, national, political or religious purity. He accuses both liberals and conservatives of sewing divisions in the pursuit of power.
Hamilton returns again and again to this theme of disagreements instead of enemies. He praises public figures like author David Brooks, a one-time Republican who grew disenchanted with his former party during the rise of Donald Trump and MAGA.
Hamilton lauds former U.S. Senator and Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan, whose voting record was liberal but who often spoke about the limits of liberalism.
Moynihan believed that the key variable in shaping who we are is not policy, but culture, and that liberals place too much faith in the government's ability to solve problems.
For his part, Hamilton agrees and argues that because of their faith, Christians have special responsibilities today, healing a broken culture.
Hamilton has his hands full with the Christian nationalists, but his message may also be a hard sell with the political left.
Younger, mostly liberal, college educated Americans today have become so secular that psychology professor Jean Twenge refers to them as âEurope, but with bigger cars.â
Sick of being judged and tired of contending with Christian Nationalists, the fastest growing major religious affiliation among younger Americans is ânone.â Indeed, they have embraced the label, proudly self-identifying as âNones.â
Hamiltonâs message may contrast sharply with the exclusivity of Christian Nationalism, but it still rests on a faith that many younger Americans do not profess. As commentator Stanley Crouch observed, such individualistic secularism does not purport to make us all atheists; what it actually does is âmake God a hobby.â
Can Rev. Hamilton take on the Christian nationalists and the nones at the same time, staying true to his stated value of disagreements not enemies?
Can he bring his different approach to faith to more people, re-asserting its value in the public square?
Stay tuned.
Godspeed, Reverend.